Sometimes enlightenment comes from the most mundane conversations, perhaps with those who you do not expect it.
was talking to my brother, intelligent man, but with totally different interests from my studies and completely away from politics, religion, theology, philosophy, anthropology, history, law and economics that occupy my mind. How many are confused aggression of Islam worldwide, the fixed component of all the conflicts that exist today anywhere in the world, are confused because until 09.11.2001 believed that I was a bit 'set for the studio too, as I foresaw that in reality things did not seem to be able to verify. How many believed that Allah was the Arabic translation of God, that the mosques were asked Arab, that the Imams were the priests and, ultimately, did not understand why Muhammad was different from Jesus
I always gave the goat For this, as I continue to consider all those goats, even intelligent, have a knowledge of religion as trivial and superficial, almost as if the concept we have of the metaphysical and the origin of things, was not decisive for the social life both for the individual's life.
Caproni, again, only to be forgiven for the enormous pain I feel.
Yet my brother, who is just as smart as me being in the same league, once listened to the details and historical accounts, sociological, cultural and anthropological did not lose a moment, and has sanctioned the answer, perfect:
"So it's idiotic to do wars and invasions, spend money and sacrifice human lives. Just bomb them with porn magazines and rock music! "
Bingo!
The truth is this: releasing the woman's body from the total domination of the male, breaking up the family-controlled based on the "uncle-averaging", typical of Islamic society still structured clan level, undermining the institution of marriage in Islam is that a mere contract of sale of the female, with a lot of out clause with penalties for the "goods" yield; emancipation of women, removing the ownership of the uterus to Muhammad, through the induction of an awareness in women about their sexuality and freedom the right of self sentimental, even in a romantic, allowing females to choose their male, and reject what you wanted from the "uncle-mediator" (fuck that ....); also introducing a movement of free expression and transgression youth, using a non-traditional music as rock'n'roll and disrupting the uncritical repetition of the teachings of the Ulema ...
Islam collapse from a social point of view. That would leave only with his mystical Sufi poetry, and the Koranic literalism: the first with good prospects, the second is intended to collapse like a house of sand in the Sahara desert.
It 's a fact, indeed, that Islam is deprived of his orthopraxy, that is the formalism that perpetuates and justifies the practical rules require, a construction is inconsistent and easily decomposable by the typical rationalist critique of the West.
That criticism has also destroyed the formalisms of Christianity, making it shine, however, that substantial Truth that has come to use the same criticism and find a way to strengthen themselves as straight, the criticism that in Feuerbach, Nietzsche and Freud had his "masters of suspicion" so important to remove what was just superstition and idolatry, giving to Christian theologians may think and argue, revealing even more clearly the meaning and message of the Church of Christ, not the critical would leave the Islamic concept of the building stone by stone.
Ben knows the nobles of Islam, and therefore their reaction to the Regensburg speech of Pope Benedict XVI was so angry and broken: in front of a logical God (the Logos), all reason and principle of all wisdom, the principle of love and charity, the dictates of the Koran implode.
"Islam" literally means "submission", and this submission is for unquestioning faith can not be discussed. Something is illogical or contradictory? Allah says, so this is right ...
not acceptable for a western purified from the age of Enlightenment ... Unacceptable for those who have listened to the Doors and AC / DC, or even Elvis ... Unacceptable to those who lived through the sexual revolution of 1968, while realizing that Herbert Marcuse was wrong at all.
not acceptable for anyone, however, in its cultural and genetic heritage, the thought of St. Thomas Aquinas, who used to recommend, in discerning what is "good, just and true," the use of recta ratio, HERE EST ET REGULA Mensur.
the right reason, the daughter of that intelligence had to be God, who is the Logos, that is intelligent, the possession of which we have for participation in the Logos makes us His image and likeness.
0 comments:
Post a Comment