reform school and that wall that does not collapse ...
The new government, through the minister of public On.Gelmini education, is trying to reform the school system.
The need is urgent, given the level of scandal that now pays the school in Italy, degradatasi gradually after 1968 and become unworthy of a country western member of the G7. However it is not the first time that ministers of the governments of every political hue attempt to reform the school over the past 20 years, yet the result has always been a failure.
I will not matter, because I do not have specific skills for debating technical issues relating to schools, but I can make it a consideration, both as a former student who attended all levels of education, from kindergarten to Degree in Political Science at the University of Padua, both as a citizen and taxpayer who looks like the taxes paid are used: the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, Communism has failed everywhere and not so much for his economic theories and outlandish utopian, but for the total inconsistency philosophical, ethical, anthropological, which made him a totally wrong and dangerous to humans.
Communism is dead everywhere, then, and only the elites in power (pardon as "the conscious avant-garde"! As Lenin said ...) fanning the flames of propaganda to justify their abuses in Cuba, China, North Korea, Burma, and a dozen other states from different continents. The Wall is
unmistakably collapsed, not to be ever built.
E 'collapsed everywhere except in the Italian school, tomb of meritocracy.
The occupation of the school was the highest goal of "conquest of power from below" theorized by Gramsci, and frankly, even if Communism is no more, I do not think that the Communists ever cede power over the surviving school.
Like those Japanese soldiers who, in the years between 1945 and 1964 (the date on which the last was found in an atoll in the Pacific Ocean), remained in position to defend the Empire of the Rising Sun, although ' Empire was over and the emperor was now powerless, and only a fetish for traditionalism Shinto.
'm not so confident about the success of the reform, but I very much hope that something will change: if he does a government with a majority of the current, then I will die without seeing the much-desired changes, and that death me seize a moment, that is arrivals with the rhythms of nature inherited from my ancestors, between 40-45 years.
with empty heads do not need to think ...
Monday, October 27, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Convert .ipa To .jar Online
The drift of justice is no longer just
cases of Peter and Mr Mason. Carretta, released after a relatively short time since their parents killed with cruelty, shocked the Italian public opinion that he still had vivid memories of the atrocious crimes. In the case of
Carretta, even adding the absurd circumstance of use inheritance by the murderer.
The distance between law, justice and their application is so clear as to create confusion and can not but give pause to those who, in life, he studied certain subjects and continues to deal with the philosophy of law, policy and research for the common good.
The thought always comes back to the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, perennial beacon in the reflection of those who seek to combine truth, justice and goodness with the reality of everyday social life. He had built a sophisticated philosophical and legal system that had as one of its cornerstones the account that the IUS, that is right, and iustum, or what is right, had words with the same root and expressed concepts who were the first emanation of the latter: IUS should not have been that it was not even iustum, so that in some maxims he said SIVE iustum IUS (ie the right to justice).
was unthinkable that a formulation of the law is not riconducesse to justice and morality.
The problem began later, when the evolution of philosophical thought separated the two concepts, first by putting the will of man as the foundation of law (and not the reason, the right reason, direct emanation of Being), and after placing the principle known as "Hume's Law", named after the English philosopher who formulated the view that "no proposition can be derived straight from the verb from a sentence straight from the verb to be. "Quite the opposite principle of Thomistic AGERE THEY sequitur, meaning" the act must comply with and follows being. "
step towards relativism is logically short, since by denying the fundamental and absolute truth of Being opens the leads to competition among all the desires of all men, each bearing an opinion a priori as valid as the others, regardless of the reason, in this way are intended to prevail only the opinions of majority, or one of the strongest, according to the principle of "war of all against all" of Hobbes (OMNES BELLUM OMNIA CONTRA).
becomes clear that the administration of justice is drifting with the application subjective judges, and the formation of laws adrift of changing opinions and temporary circumstances.
The effect is that people, the people he has in himself the innate sense of justice even if he does not know whether express or struggles to discern, you feel violated her privacy and lose trust in institutions. Not only that: he begins to feel insecure, because he could not receive justice in the case of a wrong right away and begins to want to prevent any crime, so there should be no trial. Hence the maniacal and ever-growing need of security required by administrations, with the corollary of significant expenditure for police, surveillance, preventive measures, etc., not to mention the difficult social relations polluted by a snaking suspicion and fear.
The solution is complex, because as we saw the problem was caused by centuries of reflection today show that all their fallacy, but have so far been considered creditworthy and, indeed, signs of progress of human reason.
Return to a thought system hinged on three main principles bonum, iustum ET VERUM, like the wonderfully built by St. Thomas requires an enormous effort of conversion.
Precisely this, however, is the task entrusted to men of good will.
cases of Peter and Mr Mason. Carretta, released after a relatively short time since their parents killed with cruelty, shocked the Italian public opinion that he still had vivid memories of the atrocious crimes. In the case of
Carretta, even adding the absurd circumstance of use inheritance by the murderer.
The distance between law, justice and their application is so clear as to create confusion and can not but give pause to those who, in life, he studied certain subjects and continues to deal with the philosophy of law, policy and research for the common good.
The thought always comes back to the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, perennial beacon in the reflection of those who seek to combine truth, justice and goodness with the reality of everyday social life. He had built a sophisticated philosophical and legal system that had as one of its cornerstones the account that the IUS, that is right, and iustum, or what is right, had words with the same root and expressed concepts who were the first emanation of the latter: IUS should not have been that it was not even iustum, so that in some maxims he said SIVE iustum IUS (ie the right to justice).
was unthinkable that a formulation of the law is not riconducesse to justice and morality.
The problem began later, when the evolution of philosophical thought separated the two concepts, first by putting the will of man as the foundation of law (and not the reason, the right reason, direct emanation of Being), and after placing the principle known as "Hume's Law", named after the English philosopher who formulated the view that "no proposition can be derived straight from the verb from a sentence straight from the verb to be. "Quite the opposite principle of Thomistic AGERE THEY sequitur, meaning" the act must comply with and follows being. "
step towards relativism is logically short, since by denying the fundamental and absolute truth of Being opens the leads to competition among all the desires of all men, each bearing an opinion a priori as valid as the others, regardless of the reason, in this way are intended to prevail only the opinions of majority, or one of the strongest, according to the principle of "war of all against all" of Hobbes (OMNES BELLUM OMNIA CONTRA).
becomes clear that the administration of justice is drifting with the application subjective judges, and the formation of laws adrift of changing opinions and temporary circumstances.
The effect is that people, the people he has in himself the innate sense of justice even if he does not know whether express or struggles to discern, you feel violated her privacy and lose trust in institutions. Not only that: he begins to feel insecure, because he could not receive justice in the case of a wrong right away and begins to want to prevent any crime, so there should be no trial. Hence the maniacal and ever-growing need of security required by administrations, with the corollary of significant expenditure for police, surveillance, preventive measures, etc., not to mention the difficult social relations polluted by a snaking suspicion and fear.
The solution is complex, because as we saw the problem was caused by centuries of reflection today show that all their fallacy, but have so far been considered creditworthy and, indeed, signs of progress of human reason.
Return to a thought system hinged on three main principles bonum, iustum ET VERUM, like the wonderfully built by St. Thomas requires an enormous effort of conversion.
Precisely this, however, is the task entrusted to men of good will.
Saturday, October 11, 2008
How To Get My Wife To Masterbate Online
The utopian reform of football
Calcium is the 4th largest industry by turnover in Italy. It is not just a sport, is a kind of national craze and typhoid is a cross between the socialization of tribal and aggregation of a religious mystic. Talking with snobby enough, as if the same thing that was maybe 50 years ago, is more stupid than superficial.
The football teams, then, are no longer of partnerships that bring together some players to compete in a championship, they have become real institutions that have the characteristics to which the moral and ideological supporters adhere, representing a wealth of cultural ideal, social, can not be left to the whim of the individual, are a heritage of the community.
In a word, are "institutions".
For this reason, it is not right that they are left in a legal regime purposes subject to the rules of contract law and corporate law, as it is not right that they can fail or that they can depend on the mood of a single owner.
Also, it is not fair that the salaries of those who work for these "institutions" are determined by private contract, released from the budget parameters that would be imposed by a type of social and community management.
I know that I speak of something utopian, because I know that football clubs are used by parties to launder money from "diversified" fund be used for politics, politicians, and whores who accompany them. But in my blog I say things I think, without naming names (the names so they know them all!)
What is my idea?
Football teams with a common ownership, with ownership and popular President elected from among those members with appropriate requirements, the Board of Directors consists of five people in office for 5 years with managerial skills recognized, each company must have a "greenhouse" for youth competing in all age categories; "First Team" with a rose up to 23 players under contract by professionals for every season, budget private company, with share in the "Wages and salaries" which shall not exceed the proportion of 75% of annual revenue; to negotiate freedom for professionals sponsors with their image rights, provided they do not conflict with the company, sources of revenue: subscriptions to the stadium, selling merchandise (also varied), television rights, awards from the Federation for their achievements, contributions to voluntary fans , 5% share in the tax declaration of taxpayers who indicate their favorite team as the recipient of quota available to them for the associations of public utility, any government subsidies for education and social solidarity.
With these budgets, with the "salary cap" above, with current market conditions, the football club would become very rich, without enriching the privileged few who however, would live in great wealth, could become sources of social development rather than the protagonists of episodes are dangerous, would create social unrest because of the outrageously high salaries earned by some of their employees.
The people understand, and would just change. Justice comes from virtue.
Juventus supporters would continue to be conceited, pragmatic and sincere, the Milan jealous, cheerful and optimistic; Inter liars, dreamers and enthusiasts, the Torini depressed, romantic and fatalistic, the Romans caciaroni, outspoken and quarrelsome, the Lazio introverted, and genuine dry, and so on ...
But all could finally watch football with the serenity that it would be something new to regular, honest, no conspiracy or suspicion. Also because in this way the surplus of money that each company will build up, could easily be used for the common good.
End of the dream .... Let's look at four
Rotters overpaid, sharp operators tricking their manager, the parasites of the various television stations and newspapers, presidents semi-bandits who do not understand where she gets the money, the street clashes, officials in bad faith, the results predetermined and hoes that revolve around this Grand Casino. If every time we beat the dead man, Okay, it's not the first, and will not be the last.
Yuck!
Calcium is the 4th largest industry by turnover in Italy. It is not just a sport, is a kind of national craze and typhoid is a cross between the socialization of tribal and aggregation of a religious mystic. Talking with snobby enough, as if the same thing that was maybe 50 years ago, is more stupid than superficial.
The football teams, then, are no longer of partnerships that bring together some players to compete in a championship, they have become real institutions that have the characteristics to which the moral and ideological supporters adhere, representing a wealth of cultural ideal, social, can not be left to the whim of the individual, are a heritage of the community.
In a word, are "institutions".
For this reason, it is not right that they are left in a legal regime purposes subject to the rules of contract law and corporate law, as it is not right that they can fail or that they can depend on the mood of a single owner.
Also, it is not fair that the salaries of those who work for these "institutions" are determined by private contract, released from the budget parameters that would be imposed by a type of social and community management.
I know that I speak of something utopian, because I know that football clubs are used by parties to launder money from "diversified" fund be used for politics, politicians, and whores who accompany them. But in my blog I say things I think, without naming names (the names so they know them all!)
What is my idea?
Football teams with a common ownership, with ownership and popular President elected from among those members with appropriate requirements, the Board of Directors consists of five people in office for 5 years with managerial skills recognized, each company must have a "greenhouse" for youth competing in all age categories; "First Team" with a rose up to 23 players under contract by professionals for every season, budget private company, with share in the "Wages and salaries" which shall not exceed the proportion of 75% of annual revenue; to negotiate freedom for professionals sponsors with their image rights, provided they do not conflict with the company, sources of revenue: subscriptions to the stadium, selling merchandise (also varied), television rights, awards from the Federation for their achievements, contributions to voluntary fans , 5% share in the tax declaration of taxpayers who indicate their favorite team as the recipient of quota available to them for the associations of public utility, any government subsidies for education and social solidarity.
With these budgets, with the "salary cap" above, with current market conditions, the football club would become very rich, without enriching the privileged few who however, would live in great wealth, could become sources of social development rather than the protagonists of episodes are dangerous, would create social unrest because of the outrageously high salaries earned by some of their employees.
The people understand, and would just change. Justice comes from virtue.
Juventus supporters would continue to be conceited, pragmatic and sincere, the Milan jealous, cheerful and optimistic; Inter liars, dreamers and enthusiasts, the Torini depressed, romantic and fatalistic, the Romans caciaroni, outspoken and quarrelsome, the Lazio introverted, and genuine dry, and so on ...
But all could finally watch football with the serenity that it would be something new to regular, honest, no conspiracy or suspicion. Also because in this way the surplus of money that each company will build up, could easily be used for the common good.
End of the dream .... Let's look at four
Rotters overpaid, sharp operators tricking their manager, the parasites of the various television stations and newspapers, presidents semi-bandits who do not understand where she gets the money, the street clashes, officials in bad faith, the results predetermined and hoes that revolve around this Grand Casino. If every time we beat the dead man, Okay, it's not the first, and will not be the last.
Yuck!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)