A hearing aid is a medical device as defined in accordance with DL 24/02/1997 n. 46 and in this case falls within the statutory mandatory have to ensure complete traceability of the product and its unique installation. For those companies that have this in your hearing tested, there should be records in part because, if the prosthesis is no longer assigned to the customer should be destroyed or deconstructed and subjected to an igenizzante reconditioning and sterilization. 
The importance and value of all This is demonstrated by the fact that the obligation of traceability has been recently raised by law for the first 5 years to 10 today (like cars) at the customer warranty. But not only in the event of a malfunction at the origin, our effort (and the patient) is likely to be frustrated, by the way, today were achieved remarkable levels of sophistication, but it can happen. For mass-produced circuits only unique installation makes it possible to trace the entire chain from component manufacturer to the assembler, who puts it on the market and obviously the fitter to arrive to the customer. In addition, hearing aids, if necessary put back after testing, would not be considered as new. In fact, if a hearing is withdrawn by a trial and you do not follow the process described, is prosecuted for the crime of fraud or fraud on the market. There are also other 
medical devices, such as those shown here, why are not offered in evidence? Because there is no advertising! It 'clear that while the "evidence" 
may be of interest to the customer on the other hand it must be said that this is not a washing machine. When the test is offered by companies is a commercial ploy that pushes the sale decreases and then automatically the responsibility the seller "had tried ... so good." No medical device industry in the world and offers no possibility of immediate results from a simple rack to a more complex orthopedic limb. Who used them knows that today it took a bit 'of time and personal conviction ... certainly not evidence. Obviously this does not happen because they are involved in hygiene important as other medical devices, like hearing aids which have proved to be as widely inevitably receptors of pathogens, and communicable (just do a search on the Internet to realize how much is debated the problem). Of course, if the advertisement insists, customers then the claim but we are sure not to create false expectations and just behind these, however, there are so many reasons to abandon the use of hearing aids? Hearing is a complex task, and as such should be managed to get those positive results that our patients. We are aware that a "test" simply does not make sense because we need to work on something else. Not the best way to ensure commitment and professionalism, the sense of a proof is and remains only to make tangible, to give an idea of \u200b\u200bhow it works and pass an important first impression that the reasons seriously and calmly will want to feel better! And the result best is to go back to "communicate" talking specifically of the objectives on which (let's not forget) is called "work" even the score! 
Nobody would ever think of, except that this "nonsense" is advertised and seen as a guarantee, to "prove" false teeth!
The importance and value of all This is demonstrated by the fact that the obligation of traceability has been recently raised by law for the first 5 years to 10 today (like cars) at the customer warranty. But not only in the event of a malfunction at the origin, our effort (and the patient) is likely to be frustrated, by the way, today were achieved remarkable levels of sophistication, but it can happen. For mass-produced circuits only unique installation makes it possible to trace the entire chain from component manufacturer to the assembler, who puts it on the market and obviously the fitter to arrive to the customer. In addition, hearing aids, if necessary put back after testing, would not be considered as new. In fact, if a hearing is withdrawn by a trial and you do not follow the process described, is prosecuted for the crime of fraud or fraud on the market. There are also other 
medical devices, such as those shown here, why are not offered in evidence? Because there is no advertising! It 'clear that while the "evidence" 
may be of interest to the customer on the other hand it must be said that this is not a washing machine. When the test is offered by companies is a commercial ploy that pushes the sale decreases and then automatically the responsibility the seller "had tried ... so good." No medical device industry in the world and offers no possibility of immediate results from a simple rack to a more complex orthopedic limb. Who used them knows that today it took a bit 'of time and personal conviction ... certainly not evidence. Obviously this does not happen because they are involved in hygiene important as other medical devices, like hearing aids which have proved to be as widely inevitably receptors of pathogens, and communicable (just do a search on the Internet to realize how much is debated the problem). Of course, if the advertisement insists, customers then the claim but we are sure not to create false expectations and just behind these, however, there are so many reasons to abandon the use of hearing aids? Hearing is a complex task, and as such should be managed to get those positive results that our patients. We are aware that a "test" simply does not make sense because we need to work on something else. Not the best way to ensure commitment and professionalism, the sense of a proof is and remains only to make tangible, to give an idea of \u200b\u200bhow it works and pass an important first impression that the reasons seriously and calmly will want to feel better! And the result best is to go back to "communicate" talking specifically of the objectives on which (let's not forget) is called "work" even the score! 
Nobody would ever think of, except that this "nonsense" is advertised and seen as a guarantee, to "prove" false teeth!
Or not?
